Almanac 2016: The latest data on the voluntary sector

Today we launch the 15th edition of the UK Civil Society Almanac, once again providing a comprehensive overview of facts and figures related to the voluntary sector.

We principally use charities’ accounts to estimate the sector’s finances, as well as survey data to understand rates of volunteering and the sector’s workforce.

With so much new information to digest, we thought we’d provide our take on the headline data from this year’s edition.

Top 10 findings

1. There has been a sharp rise in youth volunteering

In 2014/15, 35% of 16-25 year olds reported volunteering at least once per month, up from 31% in 2013/14.

2. The voluntary sector paid workforce rose once again to 827,000 in 2015

For comparison, this is more than two and half times the workforce of Tesco (the UK’s largest private sector employer) and just over half that of the NHS (the UK’s largest public sector employer).

3. The value of the UK voluntary sector to the wider economy was £12.2bn in 2013/14

This is calculated as its gross value added (GVA) and was comparable to the nominal GDP of Iceland.

4. The number of charities with an income over £100m increased from 33 to 40 in 2013/14

Due to their combined contribution in terms of income to the sector we have separated these into a new income band called ‘super-major’. All this year’s analyses now include this new category.

5. There was a small increase in income to the sector this year, now standing at £43.8bn

However, mirroring our findings in our Navigating Change report, this varied according to size of organisation. The higher the income band, the greater the rise in income between 2012/13 and 2013/14, with super-major charities increasing their share by nearly £1.7bn.

almanac-2016-income-by-organisation-size

6. Income from government increased slightly, by around £0.5bn

This change occurred in the context of an increase in government departmental spending in 13/14. It also followed significant cuts earlier in the spending review period. The vast majority of this (£447m) was received by super-major charities in the form of large contracts and grants.

7. The sector continued to earn most of its income

Income from providing goods and services (also known as earned income) remained higher than income from donations and grants (voluntary income), indicating a continuing shift in the way that charities generate their income.

almanac-2016-income-type

8. Total spending for the sector rose slightly to £41.7bn

Overall, voluntary sector spending was highest from social services charities, partly as these are more numerous, but research charities spent the most on average.

9. Grant-making by the voluntary sector increased in 2013/14 to £5.3bn

This was alongside a general rise in spending. However, grant making has not returned to its 2007/08 peak of £6.1bn.

10. The voluntary sector’s assets are disproportionately held by a small number of large organisations

In 2013/14 the sector’s net assets were worth £105.1bn, with half of this (£52bn) held by just 100 organisations.

Find out more

If this has whetted your appetite, then you can visit the Almanac website for further data and analysis. If you are an NCVO member, you can also register using your membership details to download:

  • a PDF of the publication
  • the presentation from the launch
  • an additional slide pack of key findings.

Also keep an eye out for additional content that will be added soon.

This year’s Almanac was supported by Cazenove Charities.

 

Despair or diversify: Funding for the future

Find out more about this topic and get up to date on the latest trends in voluntary sector funding in our Annual Conference workshop on 18 April 2016.

Find out more about NCVO Annual Conference 2016

 

This entry was posted in Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Like this? Read more

Jennifer was senior research officer at NCVO. She worked on quantitative research for the UK Civil Society Almanac. She has carried out freelance research for a number of charities including the Zoological Society of London and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

Comments are closed.